logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2017.10.18 2017고단1052
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

From around 200, the Defendant: (a) from around 200, operated (ju) EE selling crypt and fruits in the Gurisi D market; (b) purchased approximately 60 per cent goods from (ju) Internet office; and (c) purchased the remainder from (ju garden distribution, etc. and supplied them to agricultural cooperatives, etc.

Around July 2016, the Defendant operated the above company, and around July 2013, the business became difficult to do so, and thus, the Defendant failed to pay approximately KRW 1.7 billion to the Internet Office of the above (State) and KRW 1.4 billion for goods in the distribution of (State) gardening, etc., and the Defendant failed to pay approximately KRW 1.4 billion for goods in the amount of KRW 4 billion for each month, and the amount of interest to be repaid by the bank exceeded KRW 20 million, and KRW 50 million for each month, and the financial situation significantly deteriorated, such as the occurrence of the deficit of KRW 50 million.

In addition, the Defendant received the price for goods from Mat, etc. around July 2016, and received the price for goods from 100 million won more than the purchase price for the goods paid to the Administration of Pyeongtaek (State) Internet, and received the goods from the Administration of the Internet (State 1.7 billion won) demanding the payment of the purchase price for the goods in arrears and the price for the goods to be supplied each month from the Internet Administration and around July 2016, and around August 2016, it was difficult to pay the price for the goods in exchange for the goods to the vegetable garden distribution, etc., with knowledge of the situation that it is difficult to pay the price for the goods to the vegetable garden distribution, etc.

On July 2016, the Defendant made a false statement that “I will supply pots and pots and pay the face value on the 5th day of the following month after the supply of pots and pots to the (ju) garden distribution in Seocho-si, Youngdong 127.”

However, the fact did not have the intent or ability to pay the price of the goods when the financial situation was omitted even though the capital was supplied by the injured party with the reduction of the capital and the meat.

Accordingly, the defendant deceivings the above victim and belongs to it.

arrow