Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for four months.

However, the above sentence shall be executed for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a driver of a low-priced car in B.

On December 15, 2014, the said vehicle was driven on the business of 06:40 on December 15, 2014, while driving the said vehicle, and driving the D private distance path in Gwangju Mine-gu at a speed of 40km per hour from the entrance to the parallel parallel parallel at the parallel of Pyeongtaek-dong four lanes.

There was a place where traffic has been controlled by signal apparatus.

In such a case, the driver has a duty of care to drive in his name.

Nevertheless, while neglecting this, the part of the Fone Star Cargo Vehicle, which was driven by the victim E (Nam, 62 years old), who was placed in the right line from the left-hand side of the highest passenger vehicle flive to the right line, was driven by the victim E (Nam, 62 years old) with the first top-hand part of the Fone Star Cargo Vehicle flive to the above high-speed passenger vehicle flive to the right line.

Ultimately, the Defendant’s occupational negligence suffered approximately six weeks of salt, tensions, and tensions to the victim, and the victim vehicle G (the 55 years old) from the victim’s vehicle G (the 55 years old), respectively, about 5 weeks of a cage of a cage of cage cage, brain-proof, salvin salt, and tensions.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. E statements;

1. The actual condition survey report;

1. Each written diagnosis;

1. Application of each statute on photographs;

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents under Relevant Acts concerning criminal facts, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of alternative imprisonment without prison labor;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act [Scope of Recommendation] General Traffic Accidents in Type 1 (Bodily Injury resulting from Traffic Accidents) (Special Mitigation) (Special Mitigation) / Cases where illegality in the proviso of Article 3(2) of the Special School Act is more severe (the decision of sentence] and the defendant is sentenced to three times a fine due to the same kind of crime.