A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for seven years.

The seized one brick (No. 5) shall be confiscated.

Punishment of the crime

Around 18:00 on May 29, 2013, the Defendant: (a) was the Defendant’s house bendrae of the H apartment 5 Dong 804, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Nowon-gu, 5, 804; (b) while the Defendant was fighting between the husband and the husband, the victim 1 (the 65 years of age) was fluording the wall of the victim, she was fluoring the wall of the victim, she was fluoring the wall of the victim, and she was fluoring the wall of the victim, and caused the victim’s death due to the head damage, etc.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. The whole or any part of the witness J, K, L, M and N’s legal statement;

1. Each protocol concerning the examination of the accused by the prosecution;

1. A protocol of the police suspect interrogation and statement of the police against the accused;

1. Each police statement about M,O, or L;

1. The written statement of the defendant;

1.A report on the occurrence of crime, criminal place, each investigation report, - notification of the department related to the report of 112 case, a certified copy, family relation certificate, request for genetic testing by the National Institute of Scientific Investigation and Investigative Research to test the contents of currency, photograph of the elevator board, scene pictures, inspection records, verification records and verification photographs, - photographs, etc. of the scene of crime - - photograph, such as the victim’s injury, - on-site verification results, on-site verification records, autopsy records, appraisal reports, appraisal reports, seizure records, seizure records, list of seizure records, each appraisal report, CCTV CD-related statute in which the victim is exposed to the elevator;

1. Article 259 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime;

1. Determination on the assertion by the defendant and his/her defense counsel under Article 48(1)1 of the Criminal Act

1. The summary of the argument is that the Defendant and his defense counsel, while under the influence of alcohol at the time of the instant case, tried to get the head of the Defendant by cutting the scam in berad and cutting down the scam in bera, and the Defendant, on the premise that “the victim is dead and would be scam,” went back to the state of extreme fear and interest, thereby getting off the scam and getting off the scam and getting off the scam on several occasions, and this is against his legal interest.