logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 부천지원 2018.08.31 2018고단804
산업안전보건법위반
Text

Defendant

A A A shall be punished by a fine of 5,00,000 won, by imprisonment with prison labor for six months, and by imprisonment with prison labor for eight months, respectively.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

In full view of the evidence duly adopted and examined by this court, part of the facts charged is revised or specified to the extent that it does not interfere with the defendant's defense right.

The crime place, Kimpo-si L is not the site of this case, but the neighboring land of this case where the building is located, and thus, it shall be revised in accordance with the evidence relationship.

Defendant

A Co., Ltd. shall be the 4,819m2 (hereinafter referred to as “instant site”) in Kimpo-si.

Pursuant to the agreement with H on the reclamation of earth and sand created at the site of I and the business owner who is obligated to take safety measures to prevent industrial accidents by workers employed at the site of this case, and Defendant B is the representative director of the Defendant A and the safety and health management manager prescribed by the Industrial Safety and Health Management Act, who is obligated to take safety measures to prevent industrial accidents by workers employed at the site of this case. Defendant C is a dump truck driver who transports earth and sand at the site of this case according to the agreement concluded with H Co., Ltd.

1. Defendant C is a person engaging in driving a Jump truck truck vehicle.

On December 12, 2017, the Defendant driven the above cargo vehicle around 14:20 to 30 square meters, and turned down the front of the road to the direction of the construction site on the side of the entrance of the road at the site of land reclamation work, which is located within 4,819 square meters in G Gpo-si, Kimpo-si.

At this point, it is the site of land reclamation works, and the victim K who performs signalling service is designated as an guide and is performing signalling service. In such a case, the driver of the vehicle has a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by checking the location of the victim in advance, especially the leading person, after checking the location of the victim in advance.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected to do so.

arrow