The judgment of the court below is reversed.

Defendant

A and B Imprisonment for 10 months, Defendant C's imprisonment for one year, Defendant D, E, and F, respectively.

1. Progress of this case

A. A. A prosecutor, in collusion with Defendant B, C, and D, from around December 201 to August 2012, and from around September 2012 to around April 2013, Defendant C, C, and C conspired with Defendant A, C, and E to around November 2013, and Defendant A, C, and F were to obtain consent to the use of personal information by each of the following means or methods from around December 2013 to June 1, 2014 from around 200 to around 200, and from around 200 to around 13, 200, Defendant 2, each of the above Defendants violated the former Personal Information Protection Act (amended by Act No. 14455, Jun. 2, 2014; Act No. 10665, Apr. 1, 201; Act No. 10665, Mar. 25, 201>

The foregoing former Act on Promotion of Use of Information and Communications Network and Information Protection, Etc. (hereinafter referred to as “Information and Communications Network Act”) is indicated as “Information and Communications Network Act”;

③ Defendant I (hereinafter referred to as “I”) is the representative or employee of Defendant A, B, and C.