beta
Text
The defendant shall be innocent.
Reasons
Indictment
1. Around 04:46 on February 18, 2017, the Defendant was driving a vehicle of so-called so-called Churbed with alcohol content of about 0.053% while under the influence of alcohol at approximately 18km from the roads in front of Seongdong-gu Seoul, Seoul around the same day from the front day to the roads in front of Seongdong-gu, Seoul around 05:06.
2. The Defendant is a person who drives a motor vehicle with soflurd by CAW in violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents.
On February 18, 2017, the Defendant driving the said car under the influence of alcohol content of 0.053% in blood, as described in paragraph (1) around 05:06, and driving the said car in the influence of alcohol content of 0.053% in the blood. The Defendant driven the four-lane road in front of Seongdongdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government along three-lane roads in Sungdong-dong-do with three-lanes.
At the same time, the Eknife of the victim D(28) driving in the signal atmosphere [the victim F (25 years), the victim G (25 years), the victim H (24 years), the victim I (22 years), and the victim J(25 years)] was stopped. Thus, the defendant, a driver of the vehicle, has a duty of care to maintain the safety distance between the vehicle and to prevent the accident by setting the said vehicle.
Nevertheless, Defendant 1 was negligent in proceeding as it was under the influence of alcohol, and the part of the front part of the said car, which was the back part of the said passenger car.
Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim I due to the above occupational negligence, such as the victim D, the victim F, the victim J, the victim J, and the victim G, such as satise, tensions, etc. requiring approximately two weeks of treatment, and suffered injury to the victim H, such as the catum, tensions, tensions, etc. requiring approximately two weeks of treatment.
Judgment
1. The following facts are acknowledged based on the facts admitted.
1) Defendant is only the consistent Defendant’s assertion from the investigation to the public trial, that is, evidence as to visual time from 04:30 a.m. to 04:30 a.m. on the Gangnam-gu Greendong.