logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 제주지방법원 2019.08.29 2019노384
도로교통법위반(음주운전)등
Text

The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

Although the Defendant appealed on the ground that the sentence of the lower court (one year of imprisonment) is too unreasonable, in light of all the sentencing conditions shown in the records and arguments in this case, it is not recognized that the sentence imposed on the Defendant for the reasons indicated in its reasoning is too unreasonable.

Since the appeal by the defendant is groundless, it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.

[However, in the application column of the judgment of the court below, "Article 148-2 (1) 1 and Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act (the point of a sound driving)" in the relevant provision of the law concerning criminal facts in the context of the application of the law of the court below shall be deemed to be "Article 148-2 (1) 1 and Article 44 (1) of the former Road Traffic Act (the point of a sound driving was amended by Act No. 15530, Mar. 27, 2018 and enforced March 28, 2019)", and "1. concurrent crimes" shall be corrected to be deleted.

arrow