beta
Text
1. The defendant is not guilty. 2. The defendant will notify the defendant of the summary of the judgment.
Reasons
On April 12, 2012, although C and D had no fact of deceiving the Defendant by deceiving C and D, the Defendant in the public lawsuit room sold F housing of the window counter of Changwon-si, Changwon-si, Changwon-si (hereinafter “instant housing”) at KRW 480 million to A who had already leased the instant housing at KRW 102 and 201, as if there had been no lessee, the Defendant was able to have C and D receive KRW 40 million under the name of down payment and acquired it, and thus, the Defendant was punished for fraud,” the Defendant was prepared a false statement to the public prosecutor’s office of the Changwon-si, Changwon-si, Changwon-si, Seoul, and the Defendant filed the above complaint with the public prosecutor’s office of the public prosecutor’s office on the 19th of the same month.
In this respect, the defendant made a false accusation against C and D for the purpose of having C and D punished criminal punishment.
Maz.
1. In light of the language and text of the facts charged, the facts charged in the instant case brought a complaint against C and D on April 19, 2012. Although the Defendant already leased the instant housing Nos. 102 and 201, it is premised on the purport of the said complaint to the effect that the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that he had no lessee.
However, even when examining the evidence that can confirm the purport of the defendant's complaint, that is, the statement in the defendant's complaint statement, the complaint statement, each statement in the reason for the appeal, the statement in the prosecutor's protocol of suspect interrogation of the defendant, and each statement in the prosecutor's protocol of suspect interrogation of the defendant, it does not appear to seek the above two punishment to the effect that the defendant's complaint against C and D "C and D concluded that there is no tenant's false statement."
Rather, according to each of the above evidence, the defendant knows that there are lessees who have been made oral promise while filing a complaint against C and D as above, but "G out of the investigative record statement of the defendant."