A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Seized 쇠s one of the Cheongju District Prosecutors' Office (No. 1391 No. 1 of 2016).

Criminal facts

In addition, the following crimes were committed in a state where the defendant and the person who filed for a medical care and custody application (hereinafter referred to as the "defendant") committed the following crimes in a state that they have the ability to discern things or make decisions due to the disorder of brain functions, such as the exchange hall, distortion of consciousness, damage network and related circumstances, degradation of reality judgment, etc.

1. On June 10, 2015, at around 08:40, the Defendant damaged the public property by having the 1,099,450 won of the repair cost by having the E Assistants belonging to the Donsan Police Station, who visited the Defendant for the investigation of the Defendant’s leakage or D’s traffic accidents at the front of the Defendant’s house located in Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, the Defendant damaged the use of the public property by having the 1,09,450 won of the repair cost by having the hacks and one roof of the patrol vehicle he was in possession.

2. Interference with special performance of public duties;

A. The Defendant committed on June 10, 2015: (a) around 08:55 on June 10, 2015, when the Defendant entered the house to arrest the Defendant as the current offender of damage to public property, such as paragraph (1), from the Defendant’s house located in Chungcheongnam-si, Chungcheongnam-do, Mansan Police Station H I slope of the Donsan Police Station, to enter the house to the effect that: (a) the said police officer entered the house in order to arrest the Defendant as the current offender of damage to public property, such as paragraph (1).

“One improvement, which is a high sound and dangerous object, has been added to the above police officers several times.

Accordingly, the defendant carried dangerous articles and interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers concerning the arrest of flagrant offenders.

B. On January 16, 2017, the Defendant committed a crime on January 16, 2017, around October 10:35, 2017, ten police officers, such as K Assistants, etc., from the Defendant’s home, to enter the Defendant’s house to execute a warrant of arrest issued to the Defendant under the same suspicion as the foregoing paragraph (a), and entered the Defendant’s house, one of the dangerous objects, and served the above police officers several times.

Accordingly, the defendant carried dangerous objects and interfered with the legitimate execution of police officers' arrest warrant.