A defendant shall be punished by a fine of 500,000 won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

At around 23:00 on June 25, 2014, the Defendant damaged the property equivalent to KRW 308,000 on the ground that there was no speech to be the victim F, who is the former wife of E living together with the Defendant, in front of the “D” located in Suwon-si, Suwon-si, which was located in the front of the “D,” and thus, the victim’s “G” owned by the Defendant was divided into the body of the vehicle and the body.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statements of the defendant in the first protocol of trial;

1. Legal statement of witness F;

1. Partial statement of witness H in the fourth trial record;

1. A report on cases prepared by the I;

1. All on-site photographs;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on a request for estimate;

1. Article 36 of the Criminal Act and Article 366 of the Criminal Act concerning the crime, the choice of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The Defendant asserts that the Defendant’s assertion on the assertion of the Defendant and the defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is not due to the Defendant’s act since the Defendant’s assertion of the provisional payment order, even though there were several favorable doors owned by the victim, the glass was not broken out.

살피건대, 판시 증거들에 의하여 인정할 수 있는 다음의 사정들, 즉 위 유리문 코팅지에는 피고인의 발자국이 수회 남아 있어 이 사건 당시 피고인은 유리문을 세게 찼던 것으로 보이는 점, 유리문은 하단의 특정 지점을 중심으로 방사형으로 균열되어 있어 위 지점에 국부적인 힘이 가해진 것으로 보이고, 위 균열 시작점은 유리문에 나있는 피고인의 발자국과 근접한 점, 위 균열 부위에는 코팅지가 부착되어 있고 유리문의 가장자리를 따라 상부를 향해 길게 난 균열 외에 대부분의 균열이 위 코팅지에 가려져 있어 가게 외부에서는 대부분의 균열을 볼 수 없고 피해자는 이 사건이 발생한 다음날 아침 위 출입문을 열자 균열이 확장되었다고 진술하고 있으며 피고인의 가격행위가 이루어진 직후...