(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2016.12.22 2016고정951

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2016.12.22 2016고정951

재물손괴등

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 2,400,000 won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

At around 22:00 on June 8, 2015, Defendant A (Nam, 51) of the 2016 High Court Decision A (Seoul, 2016 High Court Decision 88,000 won for repair of the said vehicle by breaking the 1st hand of the Fpoter vehicle owned by the victim E (Nam, 64 years old) who parked at the above place, out of the case D and Si expenses, at the street parking lot in front of a restaurant located in the Sungnam-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Sungnam-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City.

At around 13:45 on September 19, 2015, the Defendant “2016 High 952” sent to the victim J on the street in front of the H Licensed Real Estate Agent G in Seongbuk-gu, Sungnam-gu, Sungnam-si, and sent to the site by contact with 112 reports, and thereby preventing the scambling of himself/herself, who is the victim, from scambling and melting him/her with the scam of the Sungnam-gu Police Station I box belonging to the Sungnam-gu, Sungnam-gu, Sungnam-gu, the victim, who was called the victim at the site, on the ground that he/she shall not wear the scambling and embling him/her, and that he/she shall open the victim to the public.

At around 05:35 on May 14, 2015, the Defendant, “2016 Highly 953”, at the N office located on the fiveth floor in Seongbuk-gu, Sung-gu, Sung-gu, Sung-gu, Sung-gu, Ma, the Defendant: (a) caused the victim P (the age of 59), who was aware of the phrase “AC 59 years of age,” the Plaintiff, who was in a dispute with the director of the said manpower office due to daily distribution; (b) caused the victim’s injury where the victim’s losses were collected, and the victim was unable to know the number of days of treatment for which part of the victim was drafted, and the victim’s losses were laid down.

Summary of Evidence

"2016 High Court 951"

1. A protocol concerning the police interrogation of the accused;

1. E statements;

1. Photographs and quotation;

1. Investigation report "2016, 952";

1. A protocol concerning the police interrogation of the accused;

1. Statement to J police officers;

1. A complaint;

1. Investigation reports "2016, 953";

1. A protocol concerning the police interrogation of the accused;

1. A P statement;