1. The plaintiff's claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. As to the ownership of real estate, F is entitled to the ownership of real estate in this case on April 27, 1962, which was 628 square meters before E in Kimhae-si on April 27, 1962.

On March 30, 1962, F completed the registration of transfer of ownership on the ground of the completion of repayment. 2) The F completed the registration of transfer of ownership on the instant real estate on January 5, 2007 with respect to G on the ground of donation on December 28, 2006.

3) G completed the registration of ownership transfer on March 17, 2017 with respect to the instant real estate to D, the grandchildren of March 20, 2017, on the ground of donation on March 17, 2017. (b) Defendants B and C are children born between F and G, and Defendant D is children of Defendant B.

2) The Plaintiff’s Mamo H is the son of F, and I is the father of H’s son. 3) The F died on January 12, 2008, and G on September 10, 2018.

H seems to have died around 2000.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, entry of Gap 2 through 7 evidence (including branch numbers, if any; hereinafter the same shall apply) and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The parties' assertion

A. The network H, the primary cause of the Plaintiff 1’s primary claim, was small on the instant real estate owned by the Dongghae-si, Kimhae-si, JJ land, and K land.

The networkF attempted to sell all the above land, and as the author opposed the author’s net H, it could sell the J land and K land to L on condition that the real estate in this case was donated to the deceased H.

After that, the deceased H and I occupied the instant real estate, and since 2000, I and the Plaintiff occupied the instant real estate.

In order to clarify the registration relations, the Plaintiff entered into a sales contract with the net F on December 27, 2006, with the purchase price of KRW 20 million for the instant real estate, and paid KRW 20 million to the net F on the day of the contract.

The netF received KRW 20 million from the Plaintiff, but donated the instant real estate to the deceased G by committing a breach of trust, and thus, the registration of transfer of ownership in the name of the deceased G is null and void as an anti-social juristic act.