logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 순천지원 2017.01.09 2016고정468
농수산물의원산지표시에관한법률위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of two million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is running a cafeteria in the “C” located in B at all times, while running a cafeteria.

No person who sells or provides agricultural and fishery products or the processed products thereof after cooking shall make a false indication of the place of origin or make an indication likely to cause confusion as to such products.

Nevertheless, from February 11, 2015 to May 11, 2016, the Defendant provided the said restaurant with approximately KRW 130.43 g of the Netherlands 130.43 g and the market price of swine scrap 502,040 equivalent to KRW 502,040 at the point D of the relevant Vietnam Co., Ltd., the Defendant indicated the origin of the swine scrap as “dat fat fat fat fat” when making soup and making soup.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Investigation report (Investigation of the specifications of transactions of Netherlands and pigs);

1. - Application of Chapter Twelve evidentiary photographs on the scene of the violation.

1. Relevant Article 15 of the Act on the Origin Labeling of Agricultural and Fishery Products and Articles 6 (2) 1 of the Act on the Selection of Origin of Agricultural and Fishery Products (excluding punishment) concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;

arrow