logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 충주지원 2014.11.26 2013고정263
무고등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 4,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On June 13, 2013, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (unlicensed driving) driving a franchising car at a section of about 1km from the entrance of the farc field to E located in Samsung-gun, Samsung-gun, Samsung-gun, without obtaining a driver’s license on a motor vehicle on or around 19:00 on June 13, 2013.

2. Around 20:30 on June 13, 2013, the Defendant reported that “E was driving under the influence of alcohol after putting a small-scale 1 soldier into the top of the car volume of franchis,” at the Samsung Police Station located in the Qari-gun, Chungcheongbuk-gun.

However, as described in paragraph 1., the defendant, other than E, driven a car.

As a result, the defendant did not dismiss E with the aim of criminal punishment of E.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of witness E and G;

1. Each prosecutor's protocol of examination of the accused (including E substitute part);

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. E police statement;

1. Each written statement of the defendant and E;

1. Statement in the circumstances of an employee;

1. Investigation reports and investigation reports on June 17, 2013 (the results of victim interviews and the attachment of video CDs);

1. Video CDs;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on the Defendant’s license ledger

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act, Article 156 of the Criminal Act, Article 152 subparagraph 1 of the Road Traffic Act, Article 43 of the Road Traffic Act, and the selection of fines, respectively, for the crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act (within the scope of adding up the amounts);

1. Articles 70 and 69(2) of the former Criminal Act (amended by Act No. 12575, May 14, 2014).

1. The summary of the argument on the argument of the Defendant and his defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is as follows: (a) the Defendant did not drive without a license as stated in Article 1(1) of the facts charged; and (b) the Defendant actually driven Franchising car (hereinafter “instant vehicle”) at the time was E, thereby driving under the influence of alcohol by the police.

arrow