1. The plaintiff's claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. Land ownership relationship 1) The Plaintiff is the Plaintiff’s 4116 square meters (hereinafter “Plaintiff’s land”) before Seopo-si, Seopo-si.

(2) On June 3, 1963, Defendant D completed the registration of ownership transfer on September 10, 1979 with respect to “G land” on the ground of sale and purchase on April 5, 2016, on the ground of sale and purchase on April 5, 2016, and the registration of ownership transfer on April 28, 2016, and 146 square meters of G forest in Seopo-si, Seopo-si, Seopo-si (hereinafter “G land”) on the ground that “G land” was divided into 1296 square meters of G forest and 150 square meters of H forest in Seopo-si, Seopo-si and Seopo-si, and on the ground that it was before or after division, only “G land” was completed on March 13, 2013, on the ground of sale and purchase on January 30, 2013.

3) Defendant B and C completed the registration of ownership transfer on July 3, 2017, on the basis of sale on June 21, 2017, with regard to 1/2 shares of each of the 1190 square meters of I forest land in Seopo-si, Seopo-si, Seopo-si. The said land is 94 square meters of I forest land (hereinafter “I land”) around July 20, 2017.

J-Si and Seopopo-si J-si 196 square meters (hereinafter referred to as “J-land”).

4) On August 25, 1976, the Republic of Korea completed the registration of initial ownership with respect to K-road 3608 square meters (hereinafter “K road”).

B. F land is connected to the north-west and G land. The south-west of J land is adjacent to the north-west and the J land is adjacent to the north-west and J land is adjacent to the J land, and J land and G land are adjacent to the Seopopo City of Seopopo (Do road M. hereinafter “L”).

2) Of the K road, the part of the Sejong-type land (hereinafter referred to as the “road on the cadastral map of this case”) that is part of the K road is not currently used as a passage, and is not currently used as a passage, with the parallel between the south side of the Plaintiff’s land and the west side of the F, I, and J land and the west-si N land side of the Nanpo City in the direction of the north-west.

[Reasons for Recognition] A, Evidence Nos. 1 and 2, Evidence No. 3-1, 2, and Evidence No. 4-1, 2, and 5.