logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 서산지원 2018.02.21 2017고정300
정보통신망이용촉진및정보보호등에관한법률위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who manages the Internet homepage (D) of the “C” in Ulsan Northern-gu B.

On August 5, 2015, the Commissioner General of the Korean National Police Agency, around 20:09, under the title of “E” on the Internet homepage “C” on the Internet homepage “E”, “A war is at the same time a fire is a fluence of ideas and simultaneously is a fluence of military worship and a bruence of the will of the military. The light of the past Maritime War was a fluence of the receipt of the said disaster, and it was a fluent light of military affairs based on the idea of the fluence and the fluence of the receipt of the said disaster.

( omitted) On the other hand, the military and the people had been able to have the pathic spirit of receiving the pathicism, the spirit of view, the popular ethicism, and the ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic marithic le

The Korea Communications Commission requested the Korea Communications Commission to take measures such as refusal, suspension, or restriction of handling of information on the ground that the notice posted with the content of "the National Security Act" constitutes information that is prohibited by the National Security Act.

On September 18, 2015, the Korea Communications Commission requested the Broadcasting Communications Deliberation Committee to deliberate on the above notices. On or around the 24th of the same month, the Broadcasting Communications Deliberation Committee deemed that the above notices constituted illegal information that prohibited acts under Article 7 of the National Security Act, and decided to request the Defendant to take corrective measures on the same day, and the Korea Communications Commission ordered the Defendant to delete the above notices on or around December 15, 2015.

Nevertheless, the defendant did not comply with the above order of the Korea Communications Commission.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Copies of documents to investigate the security and provision of the Incheon Office;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on investigation (related to the investigation of witnesses F and G telephone);

1. Facilitation of the use of information and communications networks of criminal facts and the selection of punishment therefor and protection of information;

arrow