logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2016.02.19 2015나18123
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

Reasons

1. The reasons for this court's explanation is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the dismissal of the corresponding part of the judgment of the court of first instance as follows. Thus, it is citing it as it is by the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

In 3rd 2-3, “A lawsuit was filed to seek the cancellation of the ownership transfer registration and the provisional registration of the right to claim a transfer of ownership which was completed with respect to 303” was “A lawsuit was filed to seek the cancellation of the ownership transfer registration completed with respect to 303 on the grounds of the cancellation agreement around March 201 (in the meantime, around April 5, 2011, the claim for the cancellation of the ownership transfer registration was added to the claim seeking the cancellation of the ownership transfer registration).”

Four pages [based on recognition] and inserting “each entry of Category A No. 11-8, 199”.

4. The 13th class "from the time of transfer of ownership" is "from the time of delivery of all documents necessary for the transfer registration of ownership", and "not less than four years" is "not less than five years".

2. The defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow