The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. In the course of misunderstanding of facts against the victim, the Defendant brought the victim's safety mother part of the safety mother to the extent that the safety mother would go against the victim's knife due to the knife hand hand, but there was no misunderstanding of facts on the part of the victim's knife due to knife, and did not inflict an injury on the victim.

B. The sentence imposed by the court below on the defendant (two million won of fine) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. The following facts and circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the court below regarding the assertion of mistake of facts are as follows: ① the victim stated in the court of the court below that “the defendant was frighten, not a safety mother, but a frighten. The head was completely milked after frighten,” ② The court of the court below, which managed the construction site of this case, stated that “E is frighten, and the defendant was frighten, and the defendant was frightened at a place less than 10 meters away from frighten, it is not possible to frighten, but when considering the fact that the defendant was frighten, it can be deemed that the defendant was frightened. If the defendant was frightened with the safety mother, it can be deemed that the defendant was frightened.” Although the victim was frighten, it is reasonable to view that the victim was frightd by the doctor of this case and the victim stated in the judgment of the court below to the effect that the victim was frighted.

Therefore, the defendant's above assertion is without merit.

B. Although the degree of injury suffered by the victim on the argument of unfair sentencing is relatively somewhat somewhat less severe, the defendant has the power to be punished by a fine four times as a type of a crime, and the victim is the victim.