logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원마산지원 2020.08.12 2020고정164
농지법위반등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of two million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Violation of the Building Act;

(a) Any person who intends to construct or substantially repair a building shall obtain permission from the Special Self-Governing City Mayor or the head of a Si/Gun/Gu or

Nevertheless, around January 2016, the Defendant illegally constructed one religious assembly hall with a size of 20.9 square meters in Gyeong-gun K, Gyeong-gun, Gyeong-gun, Gyeong-nam without filing a construction report with the competent authority.

(b) Any person who intends to build a temporary building for the purposes prescribed by Presidential Decree, such as disaster recovery, entertainment, exhibition, construction temporary building, etc. shall commence construction works after filing a report thereon with the Special Self-Governing City Mayor, Special Self-Governing Province Governor

Nevertheless, around January 2016, the Defendant constructed four religious assembly sites of light-weight frame (19.25 square meters and one Dong, 16.24 square meters and one Dong, 20.9 square meters and one Dong, 4.3 square meters and one Dong, a total of 60.69 square meters and four buildings), three religious assembly sites of container (a container) structure (a 18 square meters and a total of 54 square meters) without reporting the construction of a temporary building.

2. Any person who intends to divert farmland shall obtain permission from the Minister of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs, as prescribed by Presidential Decree;

Nevertheless, around August 2014, the Defendant constructed a detached house with a light steel-frame structure of 103.55 square meters in the area without obtaining a farmland diversion permit in Gyeong-Gun L (243 square meters), Gyeong-gun, Gyeong-gun, Gyeong-gun, Gyeong-gun, Gyeong-gun, which is farmland. On January 2016, the Defendant constructed 8 buildings as stipulated in the above paragraph (1) for the purpose of using them for residential, religious assembly, temporary accommodation, etc. without obtaining a farmland diversion permit.

Summary of Evidence

1. The Defendant, at the first trial, withdrawn the statute of limitations and arguments.

1. M/N preparation.

arrow