logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2021.01.14 2019가단113360
손해배상(의)
Text

The defendant's KRW 52,927,716 to the plaintiff is 5% per annum from April 16, 2018 to January 14, 2021.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On April 10, 2018, the Plaintiff: (a) was hospitalized in the Defendant Hospital on April 15, 2018, and was conducted a close inspection on the Defendant’s hospital (hereinafter “Defendant Hospital”); and (b) confirmed the serious scarde of the knee-type and the kne-type kne-type kne-type kne-type kne-type kne-type kne-type kne-type kne-type kne-type kne-type kne-type kne-type kne-type kne-type kne-type

Accordingly, on April 16, 2018, the medical personnel of the Defendant Hospital performed the Plaintiff’s scambling hump hump hump hump hump hump hump hump hump hump hump hump and mathalm hump hump hump hump (hereinafter “the instant first operation”).

B. On April 17, 2018, the Plaintiff appealed from around April 17, 2018, that the left-hand bridge was not dismissed, and the medical personnel of the Defendant Hospital applied the unbrupted father and observed the progress.

(c)

On April 20, 2018, the medical personnel of the Defendant Hospital conducted the blood transfusion test. As a result of the test, the medical personnel of the Defendant Hospital conducted the blood transfusion test, and conducted the blood transfusion test on April 21, 2018 (hereinafter “the second surgery of this case”) on May 3, 2018, following the examination by dividing into the upper left-hand sule and dong sule, the left-hand sule and sule sule, the left-hand sule and sule sule sule, the left-hand sule and the sule sule sule sule sule sule sule sule sule.

(d)

On May 31, 2018, the Plaintiff discharged from the Defendant Hospital on May 31, 2018, and received outpatients from the medical personnel of the Defendant Hospital on August 13, 2018, on the 16th day of the same month, he/she was discharged from the Defendant Hospital on infections and aggravations in the upper part of the surgery while being under outpatients.

E. At present, the Plaintiff appeals to the left-hand scopic scopher of the floor, the fall of the outer sense of scopic, the left-hand scopic scopic scopic scopic, the left-hand scopic scopic scopic (hereinafter “the instant disability”) is anticipated to be permanent, and the upper scopic sc

arrow