logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2018.04.05 2018고단236
사문서위조등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant of a private document forgery is C’s wife, the spouse of B, and D Company, as an individual corporation operated by C, until 2006, was a manufacturer who was responsible for the representative director, and 50% of the shares of the said Company C, and 10% of the shares of the said Company were owned by B.

On May 2015, in order to acquire a license for water supply and sewerage system construction business to C and B, the Defendant stated that there is a need for shareholders’ seal impression, etc., and stated that there is a c and B’s intention to forge the certificate of refusal of the number of new shares in the name of C and B.

On June 4, 2015, the Defendant: (a) prepared and printed a “G acceptance waiver” and “written resolution by all shareholders,” with the content that C and B agree to give up the allotment of new shares using a computer without the consent of C and B; and (b) had the aforementioned prior ownership, even if the Defendant did not obtain the consent of C and B; and (c) had F agreed to give up the allotment of new shares using the computer.

C, B had the seal affixed to his name.

As a result, the Defendant, for the purpose of exercising rights and obligations, set forth two copies of “G Acceptance Abandonment” in the name of C, B, and one copy of “written resolution by all shareholders,” respectively.

2. On June 4, 2015, the Defendant exercised the said investigation document by having F submit a copy of the written resolution of all shareholders, as if it were duly formed, at the office located in the registry office located in the Changwon District Court located in the Changwon District Court located in 13-gil 6, Changwon-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-do., the Defendant exercised the said investigation document by having F submit a copy of the written resolution of all shareholders, as if it were duly formed.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused by the prosecution;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to all matters to be registered, a copy of a written resolution by all shareholders, and a copy of the G takeover waiver;

1. The corresponding criminal provisions of the Criminal Act concerning the facts of crime; and

arrow