1. The part of the claim for deletion of “specific construction” in the ordinary building ledger among the instant lawsuits shall be dismissed.

2. The plaintiff.

Details of the disposition

The plaintiff is the owner of the previous building of which 52.53 square meters (hereinafter referred to as "the previous building of this case") of cement block structure and cement block structure on the ground of Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government B large 9m2 and cement block structure on the ground.

On October 20, 2014, the Plaintiff reported to the Defendant on large-scale repair of the roof trusses of the roof of the previous building of this case as a reinforced concrete roof, and received the report from the Defendant on large-scale repair on the 22th of the same month. On April 27, 2015, the Plaintiff received the report on construction commencement from the Defendant on the 29th of the same month.

A summary of a building, the main purpose of which is to be divided into multi-family houses by building units, the main purpose of which is the block structure of detached houses (multi-family houses) and the main structure of reinforced concrete structures and the 52.53 square meters (building area) of 52.53 square meters (building area) of 53.57.53 square meters (building area) of 114.052.53 square meters (building area) of 52.53 square meters (building area) of 114.052.53 square meters (building area) of the existing building, the total floor area of 77.81 square meters (building area) for calculating 14.05

Ⅱ An extended reinforced concrete structure - Multi-family house of reinforced concrete structure - multi-family house of 52.53 extended reinforced concrete structure - multi-family house of 52.48 - multi-family house of 44.33.33.33

Ⅲ Repair of a roof trusses of the summary of large-scale repair by floor (three roof trussess);

IV. On July 14, 2015, the Plaintiff, a summary of large-scale repair, submitted to the Defendant a report on construction (extension and large-scale repair) with the following content:

(hereinafter “instant application”). On July 21, 2015, the Defendant rejected the instant application on the ground that the part of the first floor of the instant previous building was invaded by the construction line (road boundary line) on the Plaintiff.

(hereinafter referred to as "the instant disposition"). The Plaintiff on September 3, 2015.