logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2018.11.06 2018고단3459
업무방해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On July 5, 2018, the Defendant: (a) obstructed the Defendant: (b) obstructed the Defendant with a disturbance for about one hour, she was under the influence of alcohol in the “Dda” car page operated by the Victim C located in Suwon-gu Seoul Metropolitan City, Suwon-gu B2, and obstructed the Defendant by hand; (c) obstructed the Defendant’s disturbance for about one hour.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the victim's carpet operation by force.

2. The defendant who interfered with the performance of official duties at the time and place specified in the above paragraph 1, and at the 112 report that the defendant was f of the Suwon Police Station E District Department, sent out after receiving a report that the defendant was satisfing the defendant's satisfing, the defendant was

The term “the Defendant” refers to the purport that it was the Defendant, and the Defendant expressed the desire to see “Ye, e.g., this ar,” and the lower part of the above F was made once by the Defendant’s hand.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the prevention, suppression and investigation of police officers' crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each statement made to C and F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes by cutting off DNA CCTV images;

1. Relevant Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act (the obstruction of business, the choice of imprisonment), and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing the performance of public duties and the choice of imprisonment);

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The grounds for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Act, including the observation of protection and supervision, and the scope of the final sentence due to the aggravation of multiple crimes (including serious efforts to recover damage) in the area of mitigation [the scope of punishment] (the scope of punishment for a person subject to special mitigation] of the area of punishment (the scope of punishment for a person subject to special mitigation) that has no person subject to special sentencing] (the scope of punishment for a person subject to special mitigation) of the basic area (the scope of punishment for a person subject to punishment) (the scope of punishment for a person subject to special mitigation) of the area of mitigation (the scope of punishment for a person subject to punishment for a person subject to punishment for a period of eight months to ten years (the determination of punishment for a person subject to suspension of execution), and the circumstances and age, occupation, sex, sex, environment, motive, means and means of the defendant under suspension of execution of sentence for two years (the period of punishment for a person subject to suspension of execution of his/her duties).

arrow