1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The plaintiff's assertion

A. On October 7, 2011, the Defendant filed a complaint with the Plaintiff. The purport was that “Around October 6, 201, the Plaintiff, along with her husband C, told the Defendant that “Around October 6, 2011, the Plaintiff would not be able to do so,” and that “Around October 6, 201, the Defendant would not be able to pay the remaining deposits to the Defendant to the post office.”

On April 30, 2012, the Plaintiff was subject to a disposition by the Daejeon District Prosecutors' Office that he/she was suspected of being free from evidence, and the Defendant filed an appeal against it with the Prosecutor's Office at the Daejeon High Prosecutors' Office on August 22, 2012. The Defendant filed a lawsuit seeking compensation for damages on the grounds of the above details of the appeal, but was sentenced to the dismissal of the appeal on December 11, 2012 ( Daejeon District Court Decision 2012Da6724) and April 10, 2013 (Seoul District Court Decision 2013Na278).

B. On November 19, 2012, the Defendant filed a complaint with the Plaintiff and F, along with D and E, and the content thereof was around 10:30 on October 5, 201, F around the 1st floor entrance of the Daejeon Seosung-gu GGra, Daejeon, Gab, Gab, was snicking the Defendant’s head, and the Plaintiff abused the Defendant’s head. During this process, the Defendant’s timber and breast were flicked with flat, which was flick and flatd with the Defendant’s head.

‘The purpose of ‘ was’.

The plaintiff was subject to a disposition by the Daejeon District Prosecutors' Office that there was no suspicion of lack of evidence.

C. The Plaintiff suffered damages equivalent to KRW 1,290,00 [the remainder after subtracting the amount of KRW 360,000, which was recognized as the litigation cost (the Daejeon District Court Order 2013Kadeapo542) at KRW 1,650,000] due to the above Defendant’s tort. ② The Plaintiff suffered damages equivalent to KRW 2,750,000, paid for the defense of the complaint as described in the above paragraph (a). Thus, the Defendant suffered damages equivalent to KRW 2,750,000, paid for the defense of the complaint.