beta
Text
1. On December 9, 2002, the Defendant: (a) to B, the Daegu District Court (Seoul District Court) with respect to the land size of 362 square meters in Yong-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun; and (b) to B.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. 1) B entered into a credit guarantee agreement with the Plaintiff. B submitted the said credit guarantee agreement and received money from the seeking cooperation and the remaining suspension point of Nonghyup. 2) B did not repay each of the above loans.
Accordingly, the plaintiff paid 30,512,033 won on behalf of the principal of the loan and the damages for delay on the remaining suspension point of the Export Cooperatives and the Export Cooperatives.
3) The Plaintiff filed a lawsuit against the Daegu District Court Branch B seeking payment of the subrogated payment and its delay damages. On December 14, 2012, the said court rendered a judgment to the effect that “B shall pay to the Plaintiff the amount calculated by the rate of 15% per annum from July 19, 2012 to the date of complete payment with respect to KRW 62,275,63, and KRW 29,814,928, as to KRW 29,814,928” (Seoul District Court Branch Branch Court Decision 2012Da14171, hereinafter “instant judgment”).
(2) On January 4, 2013, the foregoing judgment became final and conclusive on January 4, 2013. (b) On the other hand, B, on December 9, 2002, owned by it, 362 square meters (hereinafter “instant land”).
(2) As to the registration of the establishment of a neighboring mortgage (hereinafter “the establishment of a neighboring mortgage”) with respect to the Daegu District Court No. 10656, No. 1066, Dec. 9, 2002, based on the contract to establish a contract as of December 9, 2002, the maximum debt amount is KRW 20,000,000, the mortgagee and the debtor as the Defendant and the debtor B, and the right to collateral security established therefrom is referred
B) Around May 29, 2017, B’s insolvency was completed. Around May 29, 2017, the instant land of KRW 14,986,000, the market price of KRW 590,000, and KRW 89,000, and the market price of KRW 742,00,000, and KRW 712,000,000, and there is no specific property other than the land of KRW 112,00,00. [Grounds for recognition] There is no dispute, Party A’s evidence of subparagraphs 1 through 6 (including a serial number), and the result of the tax information inquiry of this court, and the purport of the entire pleadings, as well as the purport of the entire pleadings.