logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2014.05.02 2014고정701
화물자동차운수사업법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,500,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On June 8, 2011, the Defendant was sentenced to one year of imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, Etc. at the Incheon District Court on October 31, 201, and the judgment became final and conclusive on October 31, 201, and on May 29, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to one year and four months of imprisonment with prison labor for the same crime in the same court on May 29, 2013, and the judgment became final

[2014 High 701] The Defendant is a person who operates a moving center in the name of “C” in Gyeyang-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, and is the actual owner of a private truck (4.5 tons truck, D).

No private-use cargo vehicle shall be provided for commercial transport of cargo.

Nevertheless, at around 11:30 on August 29, 2009, the Defendant moved from the second floor of the Song dong-dong, Incheon Metropolitan City, Song dong-dong, to the front floor of 101 Dong-gu, Incheon, the Song dong-dong, and received 600,000 won at the freight rate, while moving to the E, the above vehicle was broken down or moved to the above D vehicle, and operated 1 km.

Accordingly, the defendant provided private-use cargo vehicles for commercial transport of cargo.

[2014 High 1004] The Defendant is a person who operates a moving center in the name of “C” in Gyeyang-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, and is the actual owner of a private truck (4.5 tons truck, D).

No private-use cargo vehicle shall be provided for commercial transport of cargo.

Nevertheless, on October 14, 2009, the Defendant transferred F's moving-out of directors on the front road of Yangcheon-gu Seoul, Yangcheon-gu, Seoul, 401 Dong-dong 401, and received 610,000 won in return.

Accordingly, the defendant provided private-use cargo vehicles for commercial transport of cargo.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A protocol of suspect examination of G police officers;

1. Investigation report (H telephone investigation);

1. On-site photographs;

1. A written accusation;

1. Previous convictions: Court rulings and application of three copies of court rulings;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning facts constituting an offense and the choice of punishment, and Articles 67 subparagraph 5 and 56 of the Trucking Transport Business Act;

1. The meaning of concurrent crimes;

arrow