1. It was concluded on June 17, 2014 with respect to the one claim indicated in the separate sheet between Defendant B and B.

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff’s claim 1) between B and B on April 21, 2014, the Plaintiff entered into a contract with the 6rd local simultaneous election Seoul Metropolitan City B and a general election campaign agency for candidates for candidates at KRW 33 million and the balance 65.2 million between B and B on June 3, 2014, with the term “the 6th local simultaneous election campaign advertisement” (hereinafter referred to as “the 6th local simultaneous election campaign agency advertisement”). The Plaintiff was granted an execution clause on August 5, 2014, by reducing the debt amount of the said advertising agency contract at KRW 21 million between B and B on June 3, 2014. The Plaintiff was granted an execution clause on debt payment contract (No. 204 by a notary public) by setting the due date as August 3, 2014.

B. On June 17, 2014, B and the Defendants, the assignment contract 1) B between B and the Defendants is for non-exclusive planning (hereinafter “non-exclusive planning”).

(1) The amount of debt between Defendant A and the amount of debt shall be KRW 117860,00,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,0000,000,000,000,000

(2) On June 27, 2014, the Defendants filed an application for the attachment and assignment order of claims with each of the above notarial deeds with the vice-branch branch offices of the Daegu District Court as executive titles, on July 1, 2014, and on July 1, 2014, the said court rendered a decision on the attachment and assignment order of claims (the vice-branch branch offices of the Daegu District Court 2014TTTTTT 4796 and 2014TT 4797).

C. B at the time of entering into each of the instant claims assignment contracts with the Defendants, while B did not have any particular positive assets, B was obligated to bear obligations with respect to C with small property, KRW 60,224,273, debt 118,03,481, and debt 21 million against the Plaintiff.