The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is that the punishment prescribed by the court of the original instance (one year of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the defendant seems to have led to the confession and reflect of the crime, and one of the several victims did not want the punishment of the defendant in the trial.

There is also a circumstance that the basic recipient is a basic recipient and the health is not good.

However, the criminal liability of the defendant is not against the law.

Many criminal records have a lot of records of crime and have a record of punishment several times for the same crime, and they are repeated crimes and are likely to repeat recidivism.

In the old case, the violation of the rule was repeated.

The court of the court below rendered the sentence against the defendant by taking account of the aforementioned various positive and negative circumstances.

The judgment below

There is no new circumstance that can be considered in sentencing as a result of the sentence.

In addition, in full view of various sentencing conditions under Article 51 of the Criminal Act, such as the Defendant’s age, sex, environment, motive, means, and consequence of the commission of the crime, the circumstances before and after the commission of the crime, the lower court’s sentence is not deemed unfair.

3. Thus, the defendant's appeal is not reasonable, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act.

The proviso of Article 186 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act shall apply to litigation costs.