The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The main point of the grounds for appeal is that the court below's imprisonment (seven months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination is recognized as a normal situation favorable to the Defendant, for the following reasons: (a) the Defendant’s depth divided the instant crime into depth and reflects the Defendant; (b) the Defendant was the first offender who has no record of criminal punishment; and (c) the victim was paid KRW 60 million out of KRW 100 million out of the amount of damage caused by the instant crime; and (d) the actual amount of damage was paid out of KRW 40 million out of the amount of damage incurred

However, the crime of this case is committed in such an active manner as deceiving the victim to receive property and forging or falsifying the certificate of debts, and the quality of the crime is not good, and the victim still wishes to punish the defendant because damage to the victim has not been recovered, etc. In addition, various sentencing conditions indicated in the records, such as the defendant's age, character and conduct, motive and circumstances of the crime, and the scope of final sentencing recommended in the sentencing guidelines set out in the sentencing guidelines set by the sentencing guidelines set by the Sentencing Commission of the Supreme Court: From June to March 3, 60 [Basic Crimes, Group 2 Crimes]; Determination of the types of the crime of forging private documents: Scope of recommendations such as forging private documents, forgery, alteration, etc. of private documents: Basic area; 6 months to December 2, 200; 6 months; there is no criminal punishment; 6 months; 6 months to December 3 months; 3 months; 6 months; 6 months; 6 months; 3 months; 6 months; 3 months; 6 months; 3 months; 3 months; 4.5 months; 5 months; 4; 5 months; 4; 4; 4; 4; 4; 4; and 4; etc.

Therefore, the defendant.