A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

At around 17:00 on April 5, 2014, the Defendant committed assault, such as: (a) the Defendant, at his own house located in Simk-si, on the following occasions: (b) the Defendant, at his house in Simk-si; (c) was challenged by the police officer, who was a police officer belonging to the Police Station of the race Police Station, and was dispatched after being informed of his boomed, and was dispatched to him, and was subject to a restraint from E, which is a police officer belonging to the Police Station of the racing Police Station, by

Accordingly, the defendant, a police officer, interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning E's handling of reporting duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A protocol concerning the police interrogation of the accused;

1. Statement of the police statement of E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a criminal investigation report (related to the place of service and attaching a copy of identification card), the place of service for a police box, and a copy of identification card;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes and Article 136 of the Election of Imprisonment;

1. The suspended sentence of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act provides that the basic area of the first category of the obstruction of performance of official duties (the decision of sentence shall be made in June to April), the basic area of the obstruction of performance of official duties (the decision of the suspension of execution of official duties/the coercion of June to April), the necessity of strict punishment of the crime, the confession and reflect of the crime, the deposit of KRW 50,000 for the police officer, the deposit of KRW 500,000 for the police officer, other than the fine before and after a fine in 1987, and other records and arguments, which can be seen through the defendant's age, happiness, family environment, and the circumstances after committing the crime, shall be