beta
Text
1. The Defendant’s KRW 1,221,140 with respect to the Plaintiff and KRW 5% per annum from July 18, 2017 to November 8, 2018.
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. 1) The Plaintiff is a company whose purpose is to provide consulting on improvement projects. 2) The Defendant refers to the pre-amended by Act No. 14567 on February 8, 2017.
(4) The committee of promoters shall report the duties performed by the committee of promoters to the general meeting under Article 24 (hereinafter referred to as the "general meeting"), and the rights and duties related to the duties performed by the committee of promoters shall be comprehensively taken into account by the partnership, as a housing redevelopment and consolidation project partnership established on February 16, 2016 in order to promote the redevelopment and rearrangement project (hereinafter referred to as the "renovation project in this case").
According to the B Housing Redevelopment Promotion Committee, the rights and obligations relating to the instant redevelopment project were comprehensively taken over by the Defendant Promotion Committee (hereinafter “Defendant Promotion Committee”).
B. From July 7, 2015, the Plaintiff, including the Plaintiff’s performance of duties, performed duties such as demanding written consent for the establishment of the association and providing support for the holding of a written resolution (hereinafter “instant duties”) from around July 7, 2015, and requesting the Defendant Promotion Committee to enter into a service contract. However, even though the parties failed to reach an agreement between them, the said duties were suspended on August 16, 2015.
[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap's statements in Gap's 1, 2, 5, and 14 (including branch numbers, if any) and the purport of the whole pleadings
2. Since a service contract concerning the instant business between the Plaintiff’s assertion and the Defendant’s promotion committee was concluded, the Defendant is obligated to pay the Plaintiff the service price equivalent to the amount claimed in the Plaintiff’s estimate.
Even if the service contract was not concluded between the Plaintiff and the Defendant Promotion Committee, the Defendant is against the Plaintiff.