logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.10.14 2016고단1247
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Fraud in terms of appraisal expenses;

A. On August 30, 2014, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim D through C, stating, “The Defendant would make an internal event from the Seocho-dong to the appraisal bank work. The appraisal cost is KRW 1200 to KRW 15 million, which is one of the advance payment, and the remainder will be paid at the time of the assessment report.”

However, the defendant did not have the intention or ability to conduct an appraisal work.

The Defendant received KRW 5 million from the victim as the appraisal expense.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim.

B. On September 3, 2014, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim D through C, stating, “I will not proceed with the appraisal unless I send KRW 7 million to the victim D.”

However, the defendant did not have the intention or ability to conduct an appraisal work.

The Defendant received 7 million won from the victim as the appraisal expense.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim.

2. Borrowing money;

A. On October 2, 2014, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim that “I would be able to return to the Defendant up to October 4, 2014, if I want to lend 4 million won to the Plaintiff, if I would be able to know that I would be a guest in the golf course while I would be able to receive entertainment expenses. I would like to repay up to 10 million won.”

However, the defendant did not have the intention or ability to repay the borrowed money.

The defendant was given KRW 4 million from the victim as the borrowed money.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim.

B. On October 3, 2014, the Defendant: “The Defendant, at a coffee shop located in the Seocho Station, provided that “If he works in this case, he would have been doing a big amount of work at this time, several hundred millions. If he lends KRW 20 million, he would have repaid to G (victim D) with a flab within three days, and would provide support for KRW 200 million to the company.”

arrow