beta
Text
Defendant
In addition, the appeal by the person who requested the attachment order is dismissed.
Reasons
1. The summary of the grounds for appeal and the person against whom the attachment order was requested (hereinafter “defendants”) were sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for a period of four years, the attachment order of location tracking devices, the imposition of 10 years, the attachment order of electronic device, and the order of notification of personal information disclosure, which is too unreasonable.
2. Determination:
A. In light of the circumstances favorable to the Defendant that the Defendant led to the confession of the instant crime, the Defendant committed the instant crime against the victims aged 8 years old during the repeated crime period even though the Defendant had already been punished twice as a fine for sexual assault crime, and one-time punishment, the Defendant committed the crime against the victims aged 8 during the repeated crime period, the victims who were growing out due to the instant crime appear to have suffered considerable mental suffering, and the Defendant did not receive a letter from the victims, etc., taking into account all of the factors unfavorable to the Defendant’s age, sex, sex, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, the method of the crime, and the circumstances after the crime, etc., the lower court’s sentence against the Defendant is too unreasonable.
Therefore, the defendant's ground for appeal on this part is without merit.
B. As long as the Defendant filed an appeal regarding the Defendant’s case, the appeal is deemed to have been filed regarding the claim for attachment order pursuant to Article 9(8) of the Act on the Protection and Observation of Specific Criminal Offenders and the Electronic Monitoring, Etc. of Electronic Monitoring Devices.
However, the defendant did not submit legitimate grounds for appeal against this part, and there is no reason to reverse this part even if it is ex officio.
3. The appeal by the defendant is without merit. Thus, the appeal by the defendant is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, Article 35 of the Act on the Protection and Observation of Specific Criminal Offenders, and Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act.