Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 100,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a new victim of the victim B (n, 26 years of age) and D church in the Council-si C.

From the beginning of June 2017 to August 14, 2017, the Defendant continuously attempted to approach the church in violation of the victim’s explicit intent as shown in the annexed crime list at the place of the above church, and demanded the teaching agenda, followed, and followed. On the other hand, the Defendant sent the letter letter messages of the victim to the pastors of the church attending the victim for four days every day, and sent the victim’s father on August 14, 2017.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A complaint book, Stockholm photographs on July 17, 2017, Kakaograph photographs on July 19, 2017, Kakaograph photographs sent by the victim to the pastors, Kakaograph photographs on July 19, 2017, Kaograph photographs on which no information from the sender was available, the letters sent by the victim to his father, and a statement made by the police against B.

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to inquiries, such as criminal history;

1. Article 3(1)41 of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act (amended by Act No. 14908, Oct. 24, 2017); and Article 3(1)41 of the Act on Punishment of Minor Offenses (amended by Act No. 14908, Oct. 24, 2017

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The grounds for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act for the order of provisional payment are as follows: (a) the Defendant recognized the criminal facts of this case and reflects his mistake; and (b) the primary offender who has no record of criminal punishment is recognized as a favorable circumstance for the Defendant.

However, the crime of this case bullyings the victim by repeatedly sending text messages demanding the victim to teach even though the victim expressed his intention of refusal several times, is deemed to be less light in light of the content and method of the crime, and the mental suffering suffered by the victim seems to be considerable, and the agreement with the victim or the complete damage has not been recovered until now, and the general sentencing is imposed in the same and similar cases.