The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

The summary of the facts charged is that the defendant is the actual operator of C in Y at the time of debate, who ordinarily employs four workers and operates a steel industry.

The Defendant, while working in the foregoing workplace from September 3, 2012 to July 7, 2013, was retired from the Defendant, and did not pay KRW 1,80,000 for April 4, 2013 of D’s retirement, wages of KRW 1,80,000 for May 2013, and KRW 947,360 for June 2013, and KRW 580,258 for business suspension allowances for June 2013, and KRW 5,542,08 for wages of KRW 414,470 for July 3, 2013 between the parties without an agreement on the extension of the payment date between them.

Reasons for dismissing public prosecution

1. Crimes of non-compliance with will (Article 109 (2) of the Labor Standards Act);

2. Withdrawal of wishing to punish D after the indictment of this case

3. Judgment dismissing public prosecution (Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act);