Text
[Defendant A] Imprisonment with prison labor for two years and fines for 20,000,000
The above fine shall not be paid by the defendant.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
[Basic Facts and the position of the Defendants] Gwangju Metropolitan City, from January 1, 2012, as the water quality standards for sewage treatment plants are strict, shall promote the installation of a facility to lower the permissible level of "human (P)" from 2 pm to 0.3 pm, among substances causing nutrition (hereinafter "total human treatment facility"), and around December 14, 2010, notified the public announcement of construction for the total human treatment facilities of the 1 and the 2 sewage treatment plant (total project cost amounting to 98.2 billion won).
Accordingly, 15 members of the Seoul Special Metropolitan City Local Construction Technology Deliberation Committee (hereinafter referred to as the "Council members of design deliberation subcommittee") were selected as members of the design deliberation subcommittee and subcommittees on total disposal facilities (hereinafter referred to as "evaluation committee members") around March 24, 201 in order to examine the basic design documents, etc. submitted by the said 4 joint contractors, four joint contractors, each of which was the main axis of the bidding, J Co., Ltd., K Co., Ltd., K Co., Ltd., and L Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as "former Co., Ltd."). The evaluation conducted around April 21, 201, as a result of the evaluation conducted around April 21, 201, the joint contractors with I as the main axis were selected as first.
Defendant
A A is a public official belonging to Gwangju Metropolitan City as a member of the Design Deliberation Committee around May 1, 2010 and is appointed as an evaluation member of the foregoing subcommittee in the field of sewage and environment around March 24, 201, and Defendant B is an I employee.
【Criminal Facts】
1. On April 201, Defendant A received 20,000,000 won and accepted the bribe in relation to his duties, along with the solicitation that Defendant A received instructions from the manager of the headquarters of the Civil Works and Business Headquarters of the I Co., Ltd. to the effect that “at the time of evaluating the design of a disposal facility, Defendant A would give a high score” from B, who received orders from the manager of the headquarters of the I Co., Ltd.
2. Defendant B, in collusion withO, delivered KRW 20,000,000 to A as described in paragraph (1), and offered a bribe in relation to public official’s duties.