beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. At around 02:00 on December 5, 201, the Defendant: (a) opened a locked gate and intruded into the house, and then cut off the son’s house installed in a plastic house, the Defendant 1.62,00 won at the market price of the victim’s possession, which was located in the plastic house installed in the Mail.
2. On December 9, 201, at around 02:00, the Defendant: (a) opened a locked gate and intruded into the house into the house; and (b) cut off the thring of the 2,16,000 won at the market price of the victim D, who was located in the vinyl installed in the mast, in the mast, with a thrue prepared in advance to prepare four thrings of rice in an amount equivalent to KRW 2,10,00.
3. On December 13, 201, at around 03:00, the Defendant: (a) opened a locked gate and intruded into the house; and (b) cut off 162,00,000 won at the market price of the victim D, who was located in a plastic house installed in a marina; and (c) laid off 3 thrings of rice in advance.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendant's legal statement;
1. Each police statement of E and D;
1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the list of seizure and photographs of seized articles;
1. Article 330 of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts and Article 330 of the choice of punishment;
1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;
1. In light of the fact that the defendant's reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act and Article 59 of the Act on Probation, etc. had been sentenced to three times a fine for the same kind of crime, and one time a suspended sentence, the defendant should be subject to a strict punishment for the defendant.
However, it is difficult to view that the defendant's mistake is divided and reflects that he would not commit the same crime again, that the defendant has no record of punishment for the same kind of crime, that there is no record of punishment for the same crime, and that the total amount of damage is excessive to 5,40,000 won, and that the damaged goods return to the victim or the remainder of the defendant.