1.In accordance with changes in claims in the trial, the judgment of the first instance shall be changed as follows:

The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

1. The reasons for the court's explanation of this case are as follows: the "F" of the third, fourth, and nine instances of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be respectively dismissed as "D"; and the reasons for the judgment of the plaintiff's assertion shall be as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the addition of the judgment of the plaintiff's assertion as follows; therefore, it shall be cited in accordance with the

[Supplementary portion] The plaintiff asserts to the effect that, around March 2014, D, who is a public official in charge of G, kept the plaintiff's seal imprint, certificate of personal seal impression, etc., the plaintiff arbitrarily prepared the confirmation document of this case (No. 7) and is invalid.

The fact that D, who is a public official in charge of G, written the confirmation of this case, does not conflict between the parties; on the other hand, Eul's testimony as witness D, and each fact inquiry into the original market of the court of first instance and this court; i.e., the plaintiff visited the original viewer in the process of receiving compensation for the real estate of this case on or around March 2014; i.e., the plaintiff visited the original viewer in the process of receiving the compensation for the real estate of this case; and at the time, D, who had worked as the original viewer E and his employee, promises not to file any claim for land rent and any other lawsuit in connection with the receipt of compensation for the above goods; ii) affixing the plaintiff's personal information on behalf of the plaintiff; iii) affixing the plaintiff's seal imprint affixed with the certificate of personal seal impression issued directly by the plaintiff; and iv) at the time of signing the agreement on behalf of the civil petitioner; and ④ At the time of signing the agreement on the real estate of this case, D cannot agree to the plaintiff at the time of this case.