beta
Text
1. As to KRW 586,533,89 and KRW 341,00,00 among the Plaintiff, the Defendant shall annually pay to the Plaintiff KRW 586,53,89 from March 16, 2016 to April 7, 2016.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. The name of the apartment building to be constructed through the pre-sale after pre-sale (hereinafter “the apartment of this case”) is the apartment building B in Yongsan-gu, Yongsan-gu. The executor is the dlimz Co., Ltd., and the Si Co., Ltd. is the dlimz Co., Ltd., and the Si Co., Ltd. is the dlime Construction Co., Ltd.... upon the purchase of the apartment, the executor and the Si Co., Ltd. receive a loan from the financial institution introduced by the corporation for the preparation of intermediate payments, and the
The plaintiff and the National Agricultural Cooperative Federation, a telegraphic person, are referred to as the plaintiff, except in extenuating circumstances.
the loan contract of this case(hereinafter referred to as the "loan contract of this case").
(B) Upon entering into a contract with the Defendant, the Plaintiff paid the loan amounting to KRW 341,00,000 on May 20, 2009. (B) The Plaintiff, with the consent of the Defendant, immediately deposited into a financial account for the payment of the purchase price of the city, without having gone through the Defendant. (c) The instant apartment was approved on or around March 201, and the executor paid the loan interest by March 30, 201 (before the date of occupancy) in accordance with the agreement with the Defendant. (d) On April 14, 2011, the executor completed the registration of ownership preservation in the name of the instant apartment on the instant apartment on or before April 14, 201. [The fact that there is no dispute over the recognition, and evidence Nos. 1, 2, 6, 8, 1, 3, and the purport of the entire pleadings.
2. Principal and interest of loans;
A. 1) The parties’ assertion 1) As the period of repayment stipulated in the loan agreement in this case’s assertion has arrived, the Defendant is obligated to pay the Plaintiff the principal of the loan and interest or damages for delay from March 31, 201 to the Plaintiff. 2) The Defendant’s assertion that the loan agreement was made by the Defendant at the time of the loan agreement in this case includes only the principal of the loan. As such, the Plaintiff has no right to seek interest, damages for delay, etc.,
B. Whether the Defendant entered into an agreement on interest 1 and delay damages shall be used by the Plaintiff at the time of the instant loan agreement.