1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. Lesio-Mi (hereinafter “Li-Mi-Mi-Mi-Mi-Mi-Mi-Mi-Mi-Mi-Mi-Mi-Mi-Mi-Mi-Mi-Mi-Mi-Mi-Mi-Mi-Mi-Mi-Mi-Mi-Mi-Mi-Mi-Mi-Mi-Mi-Mi-Mi-Mi-Mi-Mi-Mi-Mi-Mi-Mi-Mi-Mi-Si-Mi-Si-Mi-Mi-Mi-Mi-Mi-Mi-Mi-Mi-Mi-Mi-Mi-Mi-Mi-Mi-Mi-Mi-Mi-Mi-Mi-Si-Mi-Mi-Si-Mi-Si-Si-Si-Si-Si-Si-Si-Si-Mi-Si-Si-Si-Sii)

B. Meanwhile, the Plaintiff, on November 21, 2017, issued a collection order (hereinafter “instant seizure and collection order”) under the Seoul Eastern District Court Decision 2016 tea64311, on the basis of the executory order of the payment order against Lesio-Min as the debtor, the Defendant as the third debtor, and the contract between Lesio-Min and the Defendant on January 15, 2015 concerning 8-1BL, Songpa-gu, Seoul, Songpa-gu, Seoul, and the contract amount and other claims possessed by Lesio-Min in accordance with the performance agreement dated November 9, 2015, until 65,90,000 out of the contract amount and other claims held by Lesio-Min against the Defendant, and served the Defendant with the collection order on November 21, 2017.

[Reasons for Recognition] Unsatisfy, each entry in Gap evidence 1 to 4 (including branch numbers), and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. As to the part of KRW 65,900,00 among the claims collected against the defendant of Lessa under the order of seizure and collection based on the summary of the plaintiff's assertion, the plaintiff's claim was stated 65,90,000.