The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.

At around 17:40 on October 25, 2013, the complainant C, the temporary chairperson of the Daegu Metropolitan City B Council (hereinafter “instant Council”) (hereinafter “Appellant”) (hereinafter “instant Council”) held a meeting to elect the 6th chairman of the instant B Council at the conference room located in Daegu-gun D, the gist of the facts charged was as follows: (a) on October 25, 2013; (b) on the part of the members and residents who are qualified as the chairperson, there was a disturbance, such as the occurrence of a dispute between the members and residents; and (c) on the other hand, the Council declared closed and tried to have the conference room.

Accordingly, E was put up with the arms of the victim, and F was set up with the entrance, and the Defendant, G, and H was laid off with the body of the victim, and the victim was detained for about 13 minutes in collaboration with E, F, G, and H.

The Defendant’s argument and the summary of the Defendant’s argument asserted that, from the police to the court of this Court, the Defendant asserted that “The Defendant was witnessed by the 6th session of the B Council at the meeting room of the B Council as stated in the facts charged, the Defendant was merely in the entrance door door room at the time of the closure of the Appellant’s report, and there was no fact that the Appellant was in his body, and that at the time F was unaware of the situation that the Appellant was unable to leave the meeting room by locking the entrance door.”

Judgment

In a criminal trial, criminal facts should be acknowledged based on strict evidence with probative value, which leads to a judge's conviction to the extent that there is no reasonable doubt, and according to the evidence duly adopted and investigated by this court, the following circumstances are recognized.

In the course of investigation, the complainant statement to the effect that ① “E declared a closed meeting, thereby preventing the complainant from pushing ahead of the complainant’s body with the Defendant, F, G, and H, etc.” or (Evidence No. 15 pages), ② the Defendant, H, and G obstructed the front of the complainant. At the time, H was double.