Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for ten months.

However, each of the above defendants is against the defendants for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A, on March 18, 2015, was sentenced to two years of suspension of the execution of imprisonment with prison labor for 8 months at the Busan District Court for fraud, and on March 26, 2015, the said judgment became final and conclusive, and on May 28, 2015, Defendant B is a person who was sentenced to eight months of imprisonment with prison labor at the Busan District Court for a violation of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, Etc. (competence) at the Busan District Court on May 28, 2015

Defendant

A as the representative director of the corporation E, was to establish a factory in the Gyeongbuk-si F, Inc., which was owned by the defendant B and the defendant B, on the date of the lower order in 2012.

Although the Defendants intended to obtain a loan from a bank for funds necessary for the establishment of a factory, they were unable to obtain a loan from the Corporation due to bad credit standing, and the Defendants established a new corporation and intended to obtain a loan of 4 billion won from the bank, but they failed to appropriate funds for the establishment of a corporation due to the lack of particular assets to the Defendants, and subsequently, conspired to borrow money from the victims G.

On March 5, 2013, the Defendants presented the sn beam photo, etc. to the victim G’s agent at H, Gyeong-si, Gyeong-si, Gyeong-si, Gyeong-si, Gyeong-si, the Defendants falsely stated that “In doing the racing construction work in Company E, 60 million won needs to be used for factory establishment funds, borrowed KRW 60 million, which provides the sn beam beam 500 tons as collateral with secured articles, and if the sn beam cannot be repaid by June 5, 2013, the Defendants would not raise an objection even if they arbitrarily disposed of the sn beam provided as collateral.”

However, as seen earlier, Defendants and E were in a situation in which they were unable to obtain loans from the bank due to lack of any particular property or income and bad credit, and the lower court, around November 9, 2012, offered as collateral KRW 639 million from J while borrowing KRW 639 million from the J, but did not repay the borrowed money, thereby selling the lower beam beam at the J around February 2014, and using the said borrowed money for the purpose of non-loan is also a bank loan.