1. Of the instant lawsuit, the part on the loan by the Esba Savings Bank and the part on the claim for the credit card purchase price.

1. The allegations and judgment of the parties

(a)as shown in the reasons for the attachment of the claim;

(However, ‘creditor' is considered as ‘Plaintiff' and ‘debtor' as ‘Defendant'). 【No dispute exists, the entries in Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 9 and the purport of the whole pleadings.

B. In full view of the overall purport of the statements and arguments set forth in Gap evidence 7 and 9, the Seoul Central District Court rendered a favorable judgment on April 18, 2012 with respect to the loans extended to SBI Savings Bank Nos. 1 and 2 of the instant claims. The facts established on May 8, 2012 and the cards set forth in No. 163651 in the Seoul Central District Court Decision No. 2010Da163651, Jul. 14, 201, and each of the facts established on August 13, 2011 are acknowledged. Accordingly, the claims for the loans extended to the SBI Savings Bank No. 201Gadan42 cannot be deemed to have been more than ten years old, the extinctive prescription period of the instant claims, and thus, the rights protection is unlawful.

2. For this reason, we accept only a part of the Plaintiff’s claim and decide as per Disposition.