A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On November 19, 2014, the Defendant was divingd in the front of the Songpa-gu Seoul Metropolitan Commercial Building on November 21:25, 2014, and the head of the police station affiliated with the Seoul Songpa-gu Police Station D District Unit E, who was called up after receiving a report that “the drunk person takes part in the chemical group,” solicited the Defendant to invalid the Defendant, and the Defendant “this spule, width,” to the above E.

I see that the citizen's rights will be exercised as much as his age is several years, if the police officer is a police officer.

The franchisium expressed the desire as the franchisium, franchising the franchis of the above E in his hand, and assaulted his right franchis at one time by drinking the franchis.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers concerning 112 reports.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. Application of F’s written Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor concerning the crime;

1. In light of the following circumstances within the scope of sentence (basic area, period of imprisonment from June to January 4) under the law applicable to the sentencing of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (the favorable circumstances of the sentencing as set forth below) and the sentencing guidelines for obstruction of performance of official duties (basic area, Defendant’s age, character and conduct, family relationship, and circumstances before and after the commission of the crime) and other circumstances that are the conditions of sentencing as set forth in the records of the instant case, such as the following circumstances: The fact of the crime is recognized and against the order: The first offender is the first offender, the second offender is committed by drinking exclusively, and the offender appears to have committed a contingency with a lack of decentralization: The police officer’s flapsing and drinking, without being harming the police officer’s flaps; the police officer’s flapsing; the police officer’s flapsing in the D district after being arrested; the police officer’s flapsing in the D district; and the disposition above is ordered.