logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2018.01.18 2017고단3361
공무집행방해
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, the amount of KRW 100,000 shall be paid.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Around 05:30 on March 31, 2017, the Defendant filed 112 reports to the effect that, under the influence of alcohol, the Defendant was unable to find his or her wrongs that he or she had set up in his or her singing room in Seoul, Gwangjin-gu, Seoul.

Accordingly, the police officer E, police officer F, and police officer G called to the scene and tried to listen to the statement of the reason why the Defendant lost stoba, etc., while the Defendant under the influence of alcohol continued to request the search of stoba while continuing to request the above police officer to search for stoba.

Does they live as taxes to be paid in and do not find any such tax;

2.3 6 6 6 6 6 6 62222;

60 10 20 10 20 20 200

20 6 62 222

B. A large amount of spawn, spawn, and spawned with the police spawn, spawn the E’s spathn part by hand, and spawn the f’s chest part, while assaulting the G’s f’s chest part by spawning the f’s spathn part, etc.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the maintenance of the order of police officers and legitimate execution of duties concerning criminal investigation.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statements made to E, G, and F;

1. Article 136 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The defendant committed assault against police officers for the reason of sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, which requires strict interference with the execution of official duties.

The defendant makes a confession and reflects on the crime, and the degree of exercising his tangible power is relatively minor.

There are no criminal records of the same kind of fine and no criminal records of fine.

In consideration of these factors, the same type as the order shall be determined.

arrow