The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. The summary of the facts charged is CMF7 driver for passenger cars.

At around 13:00 on November 10, 2013, the Defendant continued to enter the left side of the intersection by lowering the speed slowly from the private traditional market site to the Gangwon Islands.

At the same time, since there are two lanes, a person engaged in the automobile business has a duty to turn to the right.

Nevertheless, due to the negligence that took place on the left-hand side by neglecting this, the upper left-hand side of the FF damaged vehicle was shocked into the lower left-hand side of the vehicle.

As a result, the Defendant suffered injury to the driver G of the victimized vehicle (the 22 years old) by negligence in the course of performing the above duties, such as a climatic and chloud salt, etc., which requires approximately 10 days of treatment to the chief passenger H (the 22 years old) of the victimized vehicle, such as a climatic and climatic salt, which requires approximately 10 days of treatment to the back passenger of the victimized vehicle, such as a climatic and climatic salt, which requires approximately 10 days of treatment to the back passenger of the damaged vehicle.

2. The judgment is a crime falling under Article 3 (1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, and if a vehicle which caused a traffic accident under the main sentence of Article 4 (1) of the same Act is insured under paragraph (2) of the same Article, a public prosecution shall not be instituted.

However, according to the statement of the fact of subscription to automobile insurance (53 pages of investigation records), it can be recognized that the vehicle operated by the defendant was covered by the comprehensive automobile insurance at the time of the accident.

Therefore, this case constitutes a case where a prosecution procedure is invalid because it is in violation of the provisions of law, and thus, the prosecution is dismissed pursuant to Article 327 subparagraph 2 of the Criminal Procedure Act

With regard to this, a public prosecutor who violates the safety signs of a revolving intersection shall operate a vehicle in violation of an instruction of safety signs indicating no traffic prohibition under Article 3 (2) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents.