1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The reasoning of the court’s explanation as to this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance, except for the following addition to the text of the judgment of the first instance. Thus, it shall be cited by Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

According to the third sentence of the first instance judgment, the following contents are added to the following. (The Plaintiff, at the time of refugee interview, visited franchis to apply for refugee status, and was rejected due to lack of reason for the application for refugee status. As seen in France, the Plaintiff applied for refugee status for the purpose of staying in Korea through the Internet, and became aware of the possible reasons for the application for refugee status through the Internet, and the details stated in the application for refugee status were not experienced. I would like to be employed while staying in Korea. I would like to be able to return to Korea. In addition, the Plaintiff still failed to submit relevant materials even at this court as to the assertion that he was sentenced to 15 years imprisonment with prison labor due to mistake as a terrorist list belonging to the Muslim group.)

2. In conclusion, the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.