1. The Defendant: (a) KRW 25,00,000 for the Plaintiff and 5% per annum from December 19, 2018 to June 18, 2019; and (b) the Plaintiff.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The plaintiff is a legal spouse who completed the marriage report with C on September 19, 197 and has three children between C and C.

B. From November 2015, C and the Defendant exchanged each other with each other, and exchanged with each other at the Defendant’s home, or spawd with each other to travel abroad several times.

[Ground of recognition] Each entry and video of Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 7 (including paper numbers), each inquiry inquiry reply to the head of Seoul Immigration Office, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. In principle, the act of a third party causing damage to a couple's communal life, which is the essence of marriage, by committing an unlawful act with the husband's or wife, or interfering with the maintenance thereof and infringing on the spouse's right as the spouse, constitutes a tort. Thus, according to the above acknowledged facts, the defendant is liable for damages caused by a tort against the plaintiff's mental suffering.

Although the defendant alleged that he was unaware of his spouse until July 2018, the defendant did not know of the existence of his spouse C. However, according to each of the statements in Gap evidence Nos. 7 and 14 (including additional numbers), the defendant is sufficiently recognized to have known the existence of the plaintiff, and it is difficult to reverse the defendant's assertion because each of the statements in Eul evidence Nos. 1 and 3 is insufficient to reverse it.

In addition, the defendant asserts that the marital relationship between the plaintiff and C has already reached a failure without relation to the defendant's misconduct, but there is no evidence to acknowledge it, and the above argument is without merit.

3. The following circumstances revealed in the scope of liability for damages and the evidence submitted by the Plaintiff, namely, the marriage period and children of the Plaintiff and C, the Defendant and C’s teaching system are not short, the frequency and degree of fraudulent act is not less than that of the Plaintiff, and the Plaintiff appears to have suffered considerable mental pain due to the above fraudulent act, and the Plaintiff and C, after the instant case, can be seen as having come to the failure of home due to their running away from home.