logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 진주지원 2020.05.12 2019고정128
전자금융거래법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

No person shall transfer or acquire a means of access.

Nevertheless, while the Defendant was discovered in order to obtain a loan on January 2019, the Defendant received a mobile phone text message from a person who was named “B” and received a mobile phone text message from “B,” and the Defendant introduced himself as an employee of “B,” and, in order to obtain a loan, one corporation must be established in the Philippines in the name of the party in order to obtain a loan. First of all, once sending a personal card connected to the personal account, he/she should use it to re-enter the personal account in our company’s name. When sending the personal card to us, he/she should re-enters the personal account. On the last, upon the execution of the loan, he/she listened to the purport that “the report on the loss of the personal card sent by the bank to us” and accepted it to obtain the loan.

On January 14, 2019, the Defendant, in accordance with the direction of “B”, delivered to “B” a physical card connected to the D Bank account (E) in the name of the Defendant at the Jinju post office located in 182, Do-dong, Do-dong, Jin-si, Do-dong, Jin-si, Seoul.

Accordingly, the Defendant committed an act of transferring the means of access.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement concerning F;

1. A criminal investigation report (a report on attachment of the content of Canadian dialogue);

1. Details of a warrant of search, seizure, and verification, reply data, and Kakao Stockholm dialogue;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes for transfer certificate;

1. Relevant Article 49(4)1 of the Electronic Financial Transactions Act and Articles 49(4)1 and 6(3)1 of the same Act concerning criminal facts and the selection of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The grounds for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act for the provisional payment order recognize the defendant's mistake, the fact that the defendant has no criminal record for the same kind of offense, and the age, character and conduct, environment, motive and crime of the defendant as shown in the records and arguments of this case.

arrow