logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.07.15 2014가단5033904
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The Defendants jointly share KRW 5,000,000 with respect to the Plaintiff and the period from January 27, 2014 to July 15, 2016.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Korea Daily Report Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Korea Daily Report Co., Ltd.”) is a newspaper publishing Korean daily newspaper, a daily newspaper, and Defendant B is a reporter belonging to Korea Daily Report Co., Ltd., the receiver of Korea Daily Report Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Korea Daily Report Co., Ltd.”).

B. Defendant Japan published an attached article 1 prepared by Defendant B on the 10th page of Dr. Japan and the Internet site of Korea Japan, and on Ethical 10 pages of Eth Korean Japan and www.hakoooo.com.com, Defendant B posted an attached article 2 prepared by Defendant B on the Ethical 10 pages and www.hako.com.com.

In this case, the part of the plaintiff's issue is as follows.

(1) Of the attached article 1, the title "F" and the title "I" and the title "J" among the attached article 2 "I" used the word "I" and "J" used the main title of "I" among the attached article 2 that "I would like to know that I would like to know or would like to know if I would like to know that I would like to live in a canter because I would get a detention house G and H, etc. in a canter" (hereinafter "the attached article 1") and the surrounding article 1 stated that I would like to go well if I want to receive medical treatment."

“The part(hereinafter referred to as “the part(s)”) is called “the first engineer(s) and combined with the first engineer(s).”

C. The Plaintiff asserted that Defendant B damaged the Plaintiff’s reputation by inserting a false attached Forms 1 and 2, etc. for the purpose of slandering the Plaintiff, and filed a complaint against Defendant B due to the violation of the Act on Promotion, etc. of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection, etc. (Defamation) by publications, and the Seoul Central District Prosecutors’ Office rendered a disposition that the Defendant B was not suspected of being guilty due to the lack of evidence.

On the other hand, when the rehabilitation procedure was completed on January 29, 2015 (Seoul Central District Court 2013 Ma142). On January 7, 2016, Japan taken over the lawsuit by C by the administrator of the Korean Korean Debtor, Inc., the Debtor Rehabilitation Debtor, Ltd. on January 7, 2016.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 2, 3, 3-1, 2, 3-2.

arrow